Saturday, 31 January 2009
Curious Google Earth snapshots
Sunday, 18 January 2009
KML and KMZ Benchmarking
When displaying data over Google Maps using KML and KMZ files there is always the doubt of whether it is better to use one type of file or the other. KML is the standard XML type file used by Google to display data over their maps, while KMZ is a compressed KML file. Compressing a KML file dramatically reduces its size, for example in the example used to a 26.22% of the original size, helping to save the typically scarce server space. Even though, less space does not always mean faster loading times, because it is necessary to uncompress the files, which may take a long time.
File | KML | KMZ |
Number of polygons | 2103 | |
Size in KB | 5.705 | 1.496 |
Relative size (%) | 100 | 26.22 |
Loading time (sec) | 28.94 | 12.1 |
Relative time (%) | 100 | 41.81 |
Software used | Google Earth | |
Version | 4.2.0205.5730 | |
OS | Windows XP SP2 | |
Processor | Intel Pentium M 1.73 MHz | |
RAM | 1GB | |
Web Browser | Internet Explorer | |
Connection speed | 2MB/sec Cable | |
Files hosted at | www.gisngeo.com |
This is the file used to do the benchmarking: